I know that patents are there to incentivize innovation but there are instances where things just get silly.
The lawsuit that Microsoft is slamming on Salesforce is one of these instances. Microsoft is suing for not 1, but 9 infringements, which is sure to ruffle a lot of feathers at Salesforce.
Here is an example of one of these patents:
System and method for providing and displaying a web page having an embedded menu
If you follow the link and read through all the jargon, you’ll eventually come to find that its basically a patent on having a drop down menu on site that lists additional links. How many sites and services currently have something like that? At least a couple of million, I’m willing to wager.
If you ask me, these patents are so generic that they allow the big players to bully their competitors into submission. And that’s a hindrance to innovation, not a driver. The laws need to be updated, but that will probably take at least the better half of a decade. Now Salesforce is by no means a tiny company, but simply imagine if Microsoft were to pull this shit on a startup SaaS company with some truly innovative features or additions. The poor little guy would have no other option than to throw in the towel.
Horacio Gutierrez, corporate vice president and deputy-general counsel for Intellectual Property and Licensing at Microsoft had this to say:
“We have a responsibility to our customers, partners, and shareholders to safeguard that investment, and therefore cannot stand idly by when others infringe our IP rights.”
Really? You have a responsibility to make sure nobody else in the world has drop down menus that display links? Or is it really just a ploy to weaken Salesforce, a company that is clearly beating you in CRM. It’s a shame that our current system even allows this type of corporate greed.